AI Didn't Replace My Creativity. It Gave Me More Time for It.

The biggest threat to creativity isn’t AI. It’s how much of our time goes to everything except creating.

I’ve been editing videos for nearly 20 years. Recently, I tried something new: for a luxury hotel review, I brought Codex into DaVinci Resolve to help with my editorial workflow.

On a project that normally takes about 25 hours, I saved roughly 5 hours, a 20% reduction in editing time. The cut also came back with nearly 50% fewer revision notes. I think that was because I had more time to refine pacing before the client ever saw it.

And that was my first attempt.

Here’s the important part: AI wasn’t making the creative decisions. It handled the tedious work that eats an editor’s day: sorting four hours of walkthrough footage by room, logging shots, prepping sequences. That left me more time for pacing, structure, and emotion.

I’m not fully sold on AI. I worry about what this does to entry-level editing jobs, which is where many of us learned the craft. The tools will change, and so will our industry's economics.

But I don’t think storytelling will become less important. If anything, strong creative judgment becomes more valuable.

I didn’t get into this industry because I love organizing footage or managing timelines. I got into it because I love making things.

If AI gives me more time to do that, I’m embracing it.